Apollo vs T1: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2024)
Apptronik vs Booster Robotics — independent, side-by-side analysis.
快速评判
Apollo leads in longer runtime. Overall, Apollo has an edge in 1 out of 1 compared categories.
Apollo
Apptronik
T1
Booster Robotics
DNA 指纹叠加
Apollo T1
规格参数
Target <$50,000 at scale价格$29,800
173 cm身高119 cm
72.6 kg重量30 kg
—自由度23
25 kg载荷—
4h续航时间2h
—速度0.5 m/s
支持爬楼梯支持
不支持LiDAR不支持
Google DeepMind Gemini integration计算平台NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin (200 TOPS) + Intel Core i7
生态开放度
—
Apollo
/100
75
T1
ROS2 + Python/C++ SDKs. RoboCup community. 50+ research teams.
Pros and cons at a glance
Apollo
Pros
- High rated payload (25 kg) for industrial pick-and-place
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
T1
Pros
- Shipping to customers (verified commercial availability)
Cons
- Short runtime (120 min) — frequent recharging or battery swaps
Frequently asked questions
How do Apollo and T1 compare on price?
Apollo: Target <$50,000 at scale. T1: $29,800. Only one of the two has a public unit price; the other publishes a range or enterprise-only terms.
Is Apollo or T1 actually available to buy?
Apollo is in active development without commercial availability. T1 is shipping to customers. Status reflects the vendor's published commercial position as of the last review and can change between announcement and actual delivery.
Which is better for ROS-based development: Apollo or T1?
Apollo has no ROS support; T1 has ros2. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
最后更新: 2024