Unitree Robotics vs Aldebaran (Maxvision) — independent, side-by-side analysis.
G1 leads in longer runtime, faster speed, lower price, while NAO V6 leads in more DOF. Overall, G1 has an edge in 3 out of 4 compared categories.

Unitree Robotics

Aldebaran (Maxvision)
82
G1
70
NAO V6
Full ROS2 + SDK2 (C++/Python). Active GitHub. Large research community.
NAOqi + Choregraphe. Massive academic community. Future uncertain post-bankruptcy.
G1 is cheaper at $13,500 vs $16,990 for NAO V6. Note that lower price does not imply lower total cost of ownership — see the TCO calculator on the Explore page for utilisation-adjusted figures.
Yes. Both are commercially available as of the last review. Delivery timelines and customer geographies vary per vendor — check the manufacturer page for each.
G1 has ros2; NAO V6 has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
G1 ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; NAO V6 does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
最終更新: 2024