Galbot (Galaxy General Robotics) vs Aldebaran (Maxvision) — independent, side-by-side analysis.
G1 leads in more DOF, longer runtime, while NAO V6 leads in lower price. Overall, G1 has an edge in 2 out of 3 compared categories.

Galbot (Galaxy General Robotics)

Aldebaran (Maxvision)
—
G1
70
NAO V6
NAOqi + Choregraphe. Massive academic community. Future uncertain post-bankruptcy.
NAO V6 is cheaper at $16,990 vs $87,000 for G1. Note that lower price does not imply lower total cost of ownership — see the TCO calculator on the Explore page for utilisation-adjusted figures.
Yes. Both are commercially available as of the last review. Delivery timelines and customer geographies vary per vendor — check the manufacturer page for each.
G1 has no ROS support; NAO V6 has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
G1 ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; NAO V6 does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
最終更新: 2025