T-HR3 vs CL-1: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2023)
Toyota vs LimX Dynamics — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Veredicto rápido
T-HR3 leads in more DOF. Overall, T-HR3 has an edge in 1 out of 1 compared categories.
T-HR3
Toyota
CL-1
LimX Dynamics
Superposición de huella DNA
T-HR3 CL-1
Especificaciones
Research onlyPrecioContact (research)
151 cmAltura157 cm
75 kgPeso—
42GDL20
—Carga—
—Autonomía—
—Velocidad1.11 m/s
SíEscalerasSí
NoLiDARSí
ProprietaryCómputoN/A
Pros and cons at a glance
T-HR3
Pros
- 42 degrees of freedom — full-body articulation
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
CL-1
Pros
- Ships with LiDAR for robust depth sensing in low-light environments
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
Frequently asked questions
How do T-HR3 and CL-1 compare on price?
T-HR3: Research only. CL-1: Contact (research).
Which is better for ROS-based development: T-HR3 or CL-1?
T-HR3 has no ROS support; CL-1 has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Does T-HR3 or CL-1 use LiDAR?
CL-1 ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; T-HR3 does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Última actualización: 2023