EVE vs CL-1: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2023)
1X Technologies vs LimX Dynamics — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Schnellurteil
EVE leads in faster speed. Overall, EVE has an edge in 1 out of 1 compared categories.
EVE
1X Technologies
CL-1
LimX Dynamics
DNA-Overlay
EVE CL-1
Spezifikationen
No longer marketed; existing enterprise deployments maintained, not expandedPreisContact (research)
186 cmHöhe157 cm
86 kgGewicht—
—FHG20
15 kgNutzlast—
6hLaufzeit—
4 m/sGeschwindigkeit1.11 m/s
NeinTreppenJa
NeinLiDARJa
N/ARecheneinheitN/A
Pros and cons at a glance
EVE
Pros
- Long runtime (6h per charge) for full-shift operation
Cons
- Discontinued by the manufacturer
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
- Cannot navigate stairs — restricts deployment environments
CL-1
Pros
- Ships with LiDAR for robust depth sensing in low-light environments
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
Frequently asked questions
How do EVE and CL-1 compare on price?
EVE: No longer marketed; existing enterprise deployments maintained, not expanded. CL-1: Contact (research).
Is EVE or CL-1 actually available to buy?
EVE has been discontinued. CL-1 is in active development without commercial availability. Status reflects the vendor's published commercial position as of the last review and can change between announcement and actual delivery.
Which is better for ROS-based development: EVE or CL-1?
EVE has no ROS support; CL-1 has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Does EVE or CL-1 use LiDAR?
CL-1 ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; EVE does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2023