Figure 03 vs NAO V6: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2025)
Figure AI vs Aldebaran (Maxvision) — independent, side-by-side analysis.
クイック判定
Figure 03 leads in more DOF, longer runtime, faster speed. Overall, Figure 03 has an edge in 3 out of 3 compared categories.
Figure 03
Figure AI
NAO V6
Aldebaran (Maxvision)
DNAフィンガープリント比較
Figure 03 NAO V6
スペック
~$20,000 (consumer target) · 240 units/month (Apr 2026)価格$16,990
168 cm身長58 cm
60 kg重量5.6 kg
44自由度25
20 kg搭載量—
5h駆動時間1h
1.2 m/s速度0.5 m/s
対応階段昇降非対応
非対応LiDAR非対応
Proprietary (runs Helix VLA model onboard)コンピュータIntel Atom (upgraded in V6)
エコシステム開放度
8
Figure 03
/100
70
NAO V6
Consumer focus. No developer ecosystem.
NAOqi + Choregraphe. Massive academic community. Future uncertain post-bankruptcy.
Pros and cons at a glance
Figure 03
Pros
- Shipping to customers (verified commercial availability)
- 44 degrees of freedom — full-body articulation
Cons
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
NAO V6
Pros
- Shipping to customers (verified commercial availability)
- Affordable at $16,990 — accessible to research labs and SMEs
Cons
- Short runtime (75 min) — frequent recharging or battery swaps
- Cannot navigate stairs — restricts deployment environments
Frequently asked questions
How do Figure 03 and NAO V6 compare on price?
Figure 03: ~$20,000 (consumer target) · 240 units/month (Apr 2026). NAO V6: $16,990. Only one of the two has a public unit price; the other publishes a range or enterprise-only terms.
Are both Figure 03 and NAO V6 shipping to customers?
Yes. Both are commercially available as of the last review. Delivery timelines and customer geographies vary per vendor — check the manufacturer page for each.
Which is better for ROS-based development: Figure 03 or NAO V6?
Figure 03 has no ROS support; NAO V6 has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
最終更新: 2025