Unitree Robotics vs Apptronik — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Apollo leads in higher payload, longer runtime. Overall, Apollo has an edge in 2 out of 2 compared categories.

Unitree Robotics

Apptronik
82
G1
—
Apollo
Full ROS2 + SDK2 (C++/Python). Active GitHub. Large research community.
G1: $13,500. Apollo: Target <$50,000 at scale. Only one of the two has a public unit price; the other publishes a range or enterprise-only terms.
Apollo rates a higher payload at 25 kg vs 2 kg. Payload ratings are vendor claims and do not always include a duty cycle — peak vs sustained payload can differ significantly.
G1 is shipping to customers. Apollo is in active development without commercial availability. Status reflects the vendor's published commercial position as of the last review and can change between announcement and actual delivery.
G1 has ros2; Apollo has no ROS support. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
G1 ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; Apollo does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Dernière mise à jour: 2024