Forerunner K2 vs CL-1: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2025)
Kepler Robotics vs LimX Dynamics — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Verdict rapide
Forerunner K2 leads in more DOF. Overall, Forerunner K2 has an edge in 1 out of 1 compared categories.
Forerunner K2
Kepler Robotics
CL-1
LimX Dynamics
Superposition ADN
Forerunner K2 CL-1
Caractéristiques
$34,800PrixContact (research)
178 cmTaille157 cm
85 kgPoids—
52DDL20
15 kgCharge utile—
8hAutonomie—
—Vitesse1.11 m/s
OuiEscaliersOui
NonLiDAROui
100 TOPSCalculN/A
Pros and cons at a glance
Forerunner K2
Pros
- Shipping to customers (verified commercial availability)
- Long runtime (8h per charge) for full-shift operation
- 52 degrees of freedom — full-body articulation
Cons
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
CL-1
Pros
- Ships with LiDAR for robust depth sensing in low-light environments
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
Frequently asked questions
How do Forerunner K2 and CL-1 compare on price?
Forerunner K2: $34,800. CL-1: Contact (research). Only one of the two has a public unit price; the other publishes a range or enterprise-only terms.
Is Forerunner K2 or CL-1 actually available to buy?
Forerunner K2 is shipping to customers. CL-1 is in active development without commercial availability. Status reflects the vendor's published commercial position as of the last review and can change between announcement and actual delivery.
Which is better for ROS-based development: Forerunner K2 or CL-1?
Forerunner K2 has no ROS support; CL-1 has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Does Forerunner K2 or CL-1 use LiDAR?
CL-1 ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; Forerunner K2 does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Dernière mise à jour: 2025