Apollo vs Pepper: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2023)
Apptronik vs SoftBank Robotics / Aldebaran — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Veredicto rápido
Pepper leads in longer runtime. Overall, Pepper has an edge in 1 out of 1 compared categories.
Apollo
Apptronik
Pepper
SoftBank Robotics / Aldebaran
Superposición de huella DNA
Apollo Pepper
Especificaciones
Target <$50,000 at scalePrecio$32,000
173 cmAltura120 cm
72.6 kgPeso28 kg
—GDL20
25 kgCarga—
4hAutonomía12h
—Velocidad0.83 m/s
SíEscalerasNo
NoLiDARNo
Google DeepMind Gemini integrationCómputoIntel Atom Z530
Pros and cons at a glance
Apollo
Pros
- High rated payload (25 kg) for industrial pick-and-place
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
Pepper
Pros
- Long runtime (12h per charge) for full-shift operation
Cons
- Discontinued by the manufacturer
- Cannot navigate stairs — restricts deployment environments
Frequently asked questions
How do Apollo and Pepper compare on price?
Apollo: Target <$50,000 at scale. Pepper: $32,000. Only one of the two has a public unit price; the other publishes a range or enterprise-only terms.
Is Apollo or Pepper actually available to buy?
Apollo is in active development without commercial availability. Pepper has been discontinued. Status reflects the vendor's published commercial position as of the last review and can change between announcement and actual delivery.
Which is better for ROS-based development: Apollo or Pepper?
Apollo has no ROS support; Pepper has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Última actualización: 2023