Boston Dynamics (Hyundai) vs Fourier Intelligence — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Atlas (Electric) leads in more DOF, higher payload, longer runtime. Overall, Atlas (Electric) has an edge in 3 out of 3 compared categories.

Boston Dynamics (Hyundai)

Fourier Intelligence
25
Atlas (Electric)
65
GR-2
NVIDIA Isaac (ROS2) but limited public access. Mostly enterprise.
Same ecosystem as GR-1. Improved tactile SDK.
Atlas (Electric): ~$420,000 (enterprise estimate). Not sold openly: early deployments with select customers; Atlas training center at Hyundai Metaplant Georgia operating since Sep 2026, Hyundai plans 25,000 units. GR-2: ~$150,000+, enterprise only; no US sales channel. No longer the flagship: Fourier GR-3 care robot launched Aug 6-7, 2025 (165 cm, 71 kg, 55 DOF, 3 kg payload, up to 3 h runtime, priced above RMB 200,000 / ~$27,500 for institutions in China; ~$80,000-$120,000 via Western resellers); GR-2 still offered by resellers..
Atlas (Electric) rates a higher payload at 30 kg vs 3 kg. Payload ratings are vendor claims and do not always include a duty cycle — peak vs sustained payload can differ significantly.
Yes. Both are commercially available as of the last review. Delivery timelines and customer geographies vary per vendor — check the manufacturer page for each.
Atlas (Electric) has ros2; GR-2 has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Atlas (Electric) ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; GR-2 does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Last updated: 2026