Boston Dynamics (Hyundai) vs 1X Technologies — independent, side-by-side analysis.
NEO leads in more DOF, higher payload. Overall, NEO has an edge in 2 out of 2 compared categories.

Boston Dynamics (Hyundai)

1X Technologies
25
Atlas (Electric)
10
NEO
NVIDIA Isaac (ROS2) but limited public access. Mostly enterprise.
Proprietary World Model AI. No public SDK.
Atlas (Electric): ~$420,000 (enterprise estimate). NEO: $20,000. Only one of the two has a public unit price; the other publishes a range or enterprise-only terms.
NEO rates a higher payload at 25 kg vs 20 kg. Payload ratings are vendor claims and do not always include a duty cycle — peak vs sustained payload can differ significantly.
Yes. Both are commercially available as of the last review. Delivery timelines and customer geographies vary per vendor — check the manufacturer page for each.
Atlas (Electric) has ros2; NEO has no ROS support. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Atlas (Electric) ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; NEO does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2026