Apollo vs CyberOne: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2023)
Apptronik vs Xiaomi — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Schnellurteil
Apollo leads in higher payload. Overall, Apollo has an edge in 1 out of 1 compared categories.
Apollo
Apptronik
CyberOne
Xiaomi
DNA-Overlay
Apollo CyberOne
Spezifikationen
Target <$50,000 at scalePreisNot for sale (demo only)
173 cmHöhe177 cm
72.6 kgGewicht52 kg
—FHG21
25 kgNutzlast1.5 kg
4hLaufzeit—
—Geschwindigkeit—
JaTreppen—
NeinLiDARNein
Google DeepMind Gemini integrationRecheneinheitXiaomi Mi-Sense depth + custom AI chip
Pros and cons at a glance
Apollo
Pros
- High rated payload (25 kg) for industrial pick-and-place
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
CyberOne
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Low rated payload (1.5 kg) — research or light-handling tasks only
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
Frequently asked questions
How do Apollo and CyberOne compare on price?
Apollo: Target <$50,000 at scale. CyberOne: Not for sale (demo only).
Which has higher payload: Apollo or CyberOne?
Apollo rates a higher payload at 25 kg vs 1.5 kg. Payload ratings are vendor claims and do not always include a duty cycle — peak vs sustained payload can differ significantly.
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2023