Apollo vs NAO V6: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2023)
Apptronik vs Aldebaran (Maxvision) — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Schnellurteil
Apollo leads in longer runtime. Overall, Apollo has an edge in 1 out of 1 compared categories.
Apollo
Apptronik
NAO V6
Aldebaran (Maxvision)
DNA-Overlay
Apollo NAO V6
Spezifikationen
Target <$50,000 at scalePreis$16,990
173 cmHöhe58 cm
72.6 kgGewicht5.6 kg
—FHG25
25 kgNutzlast—
4hLaufzeit1h
—Geschwindigkeit0.5 m/s
JaTreppenNein
NeinLiDARNein
Google DeepMind Gemini integrationRecheneinheitIntel Atom (upgraded in V6)
Ökosystem-Offenheit
—
Apollo
/100
70
NAO V6
NAOqi + Choregraphe. Massive academic community. Future uncertain post-bankruptcy.
Pros and cons at a glance
Apollo
Pros
- High rated payload (25 kg) for industrial pick-and-place
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
NAO V6
Pros
- Shipping to customers (verified commercial availability)
- Affordable at $16,990 — accessible to research labs and SMEs
Cons
- Short runtime (75 min) — frequent recharging or battery swaps
- Cannot navigate stairs — restricts deployment environments
Frequently asked questions
How do Apollo and NAO V6 compare on price?
Apollo: Target <$50,000 at scale. NAO V6: $16,990. Only one of the two has a public unit price; the other publishes a range or enterprise-only terms.
Is Apollo or NAO V6 actually available to buy?
Apollo is in active development without commercial availability. NAO V6 is shipping to customers. Status reflects the vendor's published commercial position as of the last review and can change between announcement and actual delivery.
Which is better for ROS-based development: Apollo or NAO V6?
Apollo has no ROS support; NAO V6 has ROS 1 only. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2023