Apollo vs Mirokai: Specs, Price & ROS Support Compared (2024)
Apptronik vs Enchanted Tools — independent, side-by-side analysis.
Schnellurteil
Apollo leads in higher payload. Overall, Apollo has an edge in 1 out of 1 compared categories.
Apollo
Apptronik
Mirokai
Enchanted Tools
DNA-Overlay
Apollo Mirokai
Spezifikationen
Target <$50,000 at scalePreis~EUR 30,000 per unit; B2B rollout targeted to begin 2026
173 cmHöhe123 cm
72.6 kgGewicht28 kg
—FHG26
25 kgNutzlast1.5 kg
4hLaufzeit4h
—Geschwindigkeit—
JaTreppenNein
NeinLiDARNein
Google DeepMind Gemini integrationRecheneinheitNVIDIA GPU
Pros and cons at a glance
Apollo
Pros
- High rated payload (25 kg) for industrial pick-and-place
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
Mirokai
Cons
- Still in development, no commercial availability
- Unit price not publicly disclosed (quote-on-request or enterprise-only)
- Low rated payload (1.5 kg) — research or light-handling tasks only
- Closed software stack — no public SDK or ROS support
Frequently asked questions
How do Apollo and Mirokai compare on price?
Apollo: Target <$50,000 at scale. Mirokai: ~EUR 30,000 per unit; B2B rollout targeted to begin 2026.
Which has higher payload: Apollo or Mirokai?
Apollo rates a higher payload at 25 kg vs 1.5 kg. Payload ratings are vendor claims and do not always include a duty cycle — peak vs sustained payload can differ significantly.
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2024